|
Home- Hawaii Accident Lawyer
General Info
What is a Personal Injury Claim? (basic)
Do I Need an Accident Lawyer?
Finding an Accident Lawyer
Get Legal Help at Hawaii Accident Lawyer

American Trial Lawyers Association

Consumer Lawyers Hawaii

Stanford Law School

American Bar Association

Marquis' Who's Who in the World, Who's Who in America and Who's Who in American Law
Sister sites:
Accident Lawyer Hawaii Attorney -
Car Accident Lawyer Hawaii -
Injury Lawyer Attorney Hawaii -
|
|
|
West Virginia
West Virginia Personal Injury Attorneys and Car Accident Lawyers Links
-
Medical Malpractice Attorney Charleston West Virginia Lawyer Sprague W. Hazard
Sprague W. Hazard, Attorney - Charleston, West Virginia, Medical Malpractice, Wrongful Death, Serious Personal Injury, Birth Injury, Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Children's Injuries, Dangerous Prescription Drugs.
-
Personal Injury Attorney Bayless Law Firm Medical Malpractice Lawyer Princeton West Virginia WV
Bayless Law Firm in Princeton, WV provides personal injury and wrongful death representation including Medical and Dental Malpractice, Products Liability, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Employment Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, Wrongful Discharge, Insurance Coverage Claims, Social Security Disability.
-
Burke, Schultz, Harman & Jenkinson : Attorneys at Law
Burke, Schultz, Harman & Jenkinson : Attorneys at Law- personal injury, automobile accidents, malpractice, wrongful death, workers' compensation, and social security disability/ssi claims
|
|

Hawaii Accident Lawyer
William Lawson, Esq.
Century Square
1188 Bishop St. Suite 2902
Honolulu, HI 96813
New client hotline:
(808) 524-5300
Main business phone:
(808) 528-2525

U.S. Accident Lawyers and Personal Injury Law Firms
U.S. Personal Injury Attorney Directory and Legal Resources
Recent Personal Injury and Car Accident News
A "magic words" distinction has been developing in the Courts in the State of Hawaii which can affect the admissibility of evidence of prior accidents. Arguing that a prior accident put a defendant on notice of a foreseeable risk of harm seems to allow a broader range of proof than claiming that it showed a "dangerous condition". If the proof is offered to show a "dangerous condition", then proof of "substantial similarity" may be required. But if the evidence is offered to show that the prior accident should have attracted the defendant’s attention to something that could be dangerous, there seems to be a lower burden of similarity required. See, Estate of Klink v. State, 113 Haw 332 (2007), Gump v. Wal-Mart Stores, 93 Hawai'i 428, 449, 5 P.3d 418, 439 (App. 1999), affirmed 93 Hawai'i 417, 5 P.3d 407 (2000).
|