|
Home- Hawaii Accident Lawyer
General Info
What is a Personal Injury Claim? (basic)
Do I Need an Accident Lawyer?
Finding an Accident Lawyer
Get Legal Help at Hawaii Accident Lawyer

American Trial Lawyers Association

Consumer Lawyers Hawaii

Stanford Law School

American Bar Association

Marquis' Who's Who in the World, Who's Who in America and Who's Who in American Law
Sister sites:
Accident Lawyer Hawaii Attorney -
Car Accident Lawyer Hawaii -
Injury Lawyer Attorney Hawaii -
|
|
|
Tennessee
Tennessee Personal Injury Attorneys and Car Accident Lawyers Links
-
Murfreesboro Tennessee Personal Injury Attorneys Lawyers
Kidwell, South & Beasley serves clients in Middle Tennessee, in the area surrounding Murfreesboro and Nashville, Tennessee. The law firm is a general practice firm concentrating in medical malpractice, divorce and family law and serious personal injury cases.
-
Knoxville Tennessee Lawyers - Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice
Farmer & Kaufman, Knoxville Tennessee personal injury lawyers concentrating in medical malpractice law, catastrophic/serious injuries, social security/disability law and workers compensation
-
Truck Tractor-Trailer Commercial Vehicle Injury Lawyer Nashville Tennessee
Law Office of L. G. Hayes, Jr., in Nashville, Tennessee, represents plaintiffs in injury and wrongful death litigation involving trucks, tractor-trailer, and commercial vehicles accidents.
|
|

Hawaii Accident Lawyer
William Lawson, Esq.
Century Square
1188 Bishop St. Suite 2902
Honolulu, HI 96813
New client hotline:
(808) 524-5300
Main business phone:
(808) 528-2525

U.S. Accident Lawyers and Personal Injury Law Firms
U.S. Personal Injury Attorney Directory and Legal Resources
Recent Personal Injury and Car Accident News
A "magic words" distinction has been developing in the Courts in the State of Hawaii which can affect the admissibility of evidence of prior accidents. Arguing that a prior accident put a defendant on notice of a foreseeable risk of harm seems to allow a broader range of proof than claiming that it showed a "dangerous condition". If the proof is offered to show a "dangerous condition", then proof of "substantial similarity" may be required. But if the evidence is offered to show that the prior accident should have attracted the defendant’s attention to something that could be dangerous, there seems to be a lower burden of similarity required. See, Estate of Klink v. State, 113 Haw 332 (2007), Gump v. Wal-Mart Stores, 93 Hawai'i 428, 449, 5 P.3d 418, 439 (App. 1999), affirmed 93 Hawai'i 417, 5 P.3d 407 (2000).
|