|
Home- Hawaii Accident Lawyer
General Info
What is a Personal Injury Claim? (basic)
Do I Need an Accident Lawyer?
Finding an Accident Lawyer
Get Legal Help at Hawaii Accident Lawyer

American Trial Lawyers Association

Consumer Lawyers Hawaii

Stanford Law School

American Bar Association

Marquis' Who's Who in the World, Who's Who in America and Who's Who in American Law
Sister sites:
Accident Lawyer Hawaii Attorney -
Car Accident Lawyer Hawaii -
Injury Lawyer Attorney Hawaii -
|
|
|
Minnesota
Minnesota Personal Injury Attorneys and Car Accident Lawyers Links
-
Personal Injury Lawyer for Minnesota and Wisconsin- Attorney Maury D. Beaulier
Maury D. Beaulier, The Beaulier Law Office and the law firm of Hellmuth Johnson, PLLC serve clients in Minnesota, Wisconsin and nationally
-
Faris & Faris Law Office, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Faris & Faris Law Office, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Minnesota law firm practicing in the areas of personal injury and dog bites.
-
Gempeler, Kenyon and Butwinick
Gempeler Personal Injury Attorneys helps clients with auto accident and product liability claims. This law firm has a reputation for hard work and for getting injured people the money they deserve from insurance companies.
Other Lawyers, Attorneys and Legal Resources Minnesota- Links
- Criminal Attorney Minnesota
Minnesota based DWI attorney and DUI lawyer advises in Criminal Defense cases. Recognized as a leader in Minnesota DWI and DUI defense.
|
|

Hawaii Accident Lawyer
William Lawson, Esq.
Century Square
1188 Bishop St. Suite 2902
Honolulu, HI 96813
New client hotline:
(808) 524-5300
Main business phone:
(808) 528-2525

U.S. Accident Lawyers and Personal Injury Law Firms
U.S. Personal Injury Attorney Directory and Legal Resources
Recent Personal Injury and Car Accident News
A "magic words" distinction has been developing in the Courts in the State of Hawaii which can affect the admissibility of evidence of prior accidents. Arguing that a prior accident put a defendant on notice of a foreseeable risk of harm seems to allow a broader range of proof than claiming that it showed a "dangerous condition". If the proof is offered to show a "dangerous condition", then proof of "substantial similarity" may be required. But if the evidence is offered to show that the prior accident should have attracted the defendant’s attention to something that could be dangerous, there seems to be a lower burden of similarity required. See, Estate of Klink v. State, 113 Haw 332 (2007), Gump v. Wal-Mart Stores, 93 Hawai'i 428, 449, 5 P.3d 418, 439 (App. 1999), affirmed 93 Hawai'i 417, 5 P.3d 407 (2000).
|