|
Home- Hawaii Accident Lawyer
General Info
What is a Personal Injury Claim? (basic)
Do I Need an Accident Lawyer?
Finding an Accident Lawyer
Get Legal Help at Hawaii Accident Lawyer

American Trial Lawyers Association

Consumer Lawyers Hawaii

Stanford Law School

American Bar Association

Marquis' Who's Who in the World, Who's Who in America and Who's Who in American Law
Sister sites:
Accident Lawyer Hawaii Attorney -
Car Accident Lawyer Hawaii -
Injury Lawyer Attorney Hawaii -
|
|
|
Maryland
Maryland Personal Injury Attorneys and Car Accident Lawyers Links
-
Maryland Accident and Personal Injury Lawyers
Jordan & Tell, Attorneys with offices in Columbia, and Bethesda, Maryland focusing in personal injury, accidents, auto accidents, automobile accidents and car accidents
-
Personal Injury Lawyer Baltimore, Maryland, Workers Compensation, Auto Accidents, Criminal Defense, Drunk Driving Attorney
The Law Office of Marc J. Atas is a Baltimore, Maryland law firm representing clients throughout the region in the areas of motor vehicle accident injuries, workers' compensation and criminal defense, including DUI.
-
Rockville Maryland MD Nursing Home Negligence Attorneys Hospital Negligence Attorneys
The Law Office of Bradley D. Schwartz, located in Rockville, MD, is devoted entirely to representing individuals and families who are the victims of nursing home negligence, medical malpractice, birth injuries, hospital negligence, car accidents, and dangerous or defective products.
|
|

Hawaii Accident Lawyer
William Lawson, Esq.
Century Square
1188 Bishop St. Suite 2902
Honolulu, HI 96813
New client hotline:
(808) 524-5300
Main business phone:
(808) 528-2525

U.S. Accident Lawyers and Personal Injury Law Firms
U.S. Personal Injury Attorney Directory and Legal Resources
Recent Personal Injury and Car Accident News
A "magic words" distinction has been developing in the Courts in the State of Hawaii which can affect the admissibility of evidence of prior accidents. Arguing that a prior accident put a defendant on notice of a foreseeable risk of harm seems to allow a broader range of proof than claiming that it showed a "dangerous condition". If the proof is offered to show a "dangerous condition", then proof of "substantial similarity" may be required. But if the evidence is offered to show that the prior accident should have attracted the defendant’s attention to something that could be dangerous, there seems to be a lower burden of similarity required. See, Estate of Klink v. State, 113 Haw 332 (2007), Gump v. Wal-Mart Stores, 93 Hawai'i 428, 449, 5 P.3d 418, 439 (App. 1999), affirmed 93 Hawai'i 417, 5 P.3d 407 (2000).
|